PPWR for printers: classifying packaging and materials

01 /

The PPWR already applies, but its requirements are phased

Regulation (EU) 2025/40 generally applies from 12 August 2026. The general recyclability requirement in Article 6(1) already applies too. Specific detailed requirements have their own application dates: 2030 is neither the overall starting date nor a general postponement.Evidence: [1]

The PPWR covers packaging regardless of material, empty or filled, including imported packaging. Function matters, such as containing, protecting or delivering other products. That does not make every printed product or plastic board packaging.Evidence: [3]

02 /

Organise the range by function, not printing process

For your internal starting point, we suggest three groups: probably packaging, probably not packaging and unresolved borderline cases. These are not official classifications. They help you provide the right samples and order details to qualified assessors. The same material can appear in different groups depending on its use.

This initial sorting uses the function-based definition in Article 3 as its starting point. It does not replace applying that definition fully to each case.Evidence: [3]

Ask sales to collect more than paper, format and quantity. Add questions about intended use, contents and destination markets to your discovery process. For borderline products, a photograph of the assembled item and a brief description are more useful than an isolated specification sheet for the printed board. Gather this information before estimating an alternative material.

03 /

Recyclability: read the phased timetable carefully

Evidence: [2]

For recyclability in the interim, the Commission refers to previous packaging requirements and related harmonised standards. Its guidance aids interpretation; it does not replace the regulation.Evidence: [2]

Our planning recommendation is not to keep a single deadline field marked 2030. Separate checks needed now from later development work and points awaiting further detail. Record the requirement and its source alongside every date. An update can then be applied to the affected product groups rather than triggering another search through your entire range.

04 /

Being a printer does not, by itself, determine your duties

In Germany, the Packaging Law Implementation Act, VerpackDG, now supplements the PPWR. The German Environment Agency also emphasises the distinction between manufacturer and producer under the regulation. These roles may coincide, but do not have to. Duties depend on the relevant role.Evidence: [4]

The agency identifies conformity, substance and identification requirements for manufacturers, among others. This does not mean every printer must issue the same declaration for every job. Determine the specific role and which requirement already applies.Evidence: [4]

Our organisational recommendation is to clarify roles using a sample order. Who develops the construction? Under whose name is it supplied? Who imports materials or finished packaging, if applicable? Who holds technical information, and who is authorised to issue a declaration? Do not leave these answers only in a contract. Give the relevant purchasing and order-processing staff access to the agreed responsibilities.

05 /

The material record: start small and stay specific

For internal data management, we recommend a material record for each relevant construction. Do not treat board with a window, adhesive and coating as simply the same record as the unprinted base board. Record the combination actually assessed and identify information covering only a component. This is a data-quality recommendation, not a statement that the combination complies.

• Identity: unique item number, supplier, material description and document version.
• Construction: base material, coating, adhesive, window and other relevant components.
• Use: intended application, contents, customer requirements and known limitations.
• Evidence: document, assessed construction, issuer and unresolved questions.
• Approval: internal owner and the combinations explicitly approved.
• Changes: a new supplier, additional finish or different customer application.

Ask suppliers specific questions: which item number and construction does your statement cover? Which processing steps are included? What information is missing for our intended use? Where there is a gap, request a clear answer rather than another general sustainability brochure. If doubt remains, leave the record open instead of replacing the uncertainty with optimistic shop copy.

06 /

Worked example: compare two carton variants deliberately

Fictional scenario: a customer orders a folding carton with a particular surface effect. The printer wants to offer a second construction. Instead of prematurely calling both variants PPWR-compliant, the team defines a bounded development project. The objective is a sound decision about this carton, not a general approval covering every future product.

1. Capture the use and requirements

   Clarify contents, protection, processing, artwork and intended application with the customer. Separate essential properties from preferences. Keep responsibilities and outstanding regulatory questions in the same brief.

2. Compare evidence for the variants

   Purchasing and production gather information for both specific constructions. The comparison covers materials, processing, availability, missing evidence and functional properties to test. Mark unconfirmed properties as unresolved explicitly.

3. Connect samples and approvals

   After agreed technical tests and any required external assessment, document the decision. Only then enter approved combinations into estimating and ordering. A later coating or adhesive change triggers a further question.

This produces a real product decision: which construction meets the stated need, which questions remain open and what implementation will cost. A material change is not worthwhile simply because a phrase on its specification sheet sounds better. The function the customer needs must also pass the agreed test.

07 /

How the shop, estimating and purchasing systems can help

Technology can support this workflow without claiming to perform an automatic legal review. We recommend clear statuses such as unresolved, documents requested and approved for this use. Attach the status to a specific combination rather than an entire category. A note for the order handler should explain what is missing and who will resolve it.

Make the approved construction visible when a customer reorders. If the supplier or construction has changed, the team should be able to recognise the difference. Estimating can provide separate items for samples, technical checks and development work. This is more transparent than hiding an undefined additional workload in the eventual production price.

• Document one recurring packaging order from beginning to end first.
• Sort open questions by product, owner and next review step.
• Connect only relevant supplier evidence to each variant.
• Carry approved data consistently into the shop, quotation and production.
• Review source updates and changed material combinations regularly.

The sensible next step is therefore not a blanket replacement of your range. Select one product group, establish whether and how it is affected, and trial a manageable data and approval workflow. You can then extend the process to other packaging. Assess non-packaging products separately against the requirements applicable to them.